McCloud discuess several terms in his
novel Understanding Comics.
The discussion of what an “icon” signifies is interesting to me.
McCloud makes the point that these icons often do not resemble the
real thing at all, but are still accepted and understood by the
masses. He also seperates these into subcatergories, such as
pictorial icon. He makes the argument that we no longer think
abstractly. We put things into categories and have trouble with
things that don't resemble their counterparts.
He
also goes on to seperate the world into two other categories, the
realm of the concept and the realm of the senses. He uses the
example of the Tin Tin comics to clarify it. The use of a
fantastical or unrealistic characters inserted into realistic
environments.
He
also goes on to talk about how other authors use abstract characters
to talk about deep issues or mature themes. McCloud reminded me of
another comic book illustrator called Art Spiegelman. He used
animals to portray the people and characters in his graphic novel
about the holocaust. The novel was violent and graphic, but with the
substitution of creatures for humans we were able to handle his
violent and gruesome images of the concentration camps during WWII.
Chapter
six is also an interesting chapter. He discusses how we are forced
to turn away from books with pictures with them and move on to books
with words. Comics are able to fully utilize the power of both words
and images. McCloud argues that this makes comics a different and,
at times, more powerful then just words alone. This depends a lot on
the artistic power of the illustrator. IF it is executed correctly,
then the words and images complete each other.
The Harrison reading was also interesting. She discusses the term "semiotics." This is a word that I had never heard before. This means the study of signs. She also breaks this down into similar categories like McCloud. The other categories are the icon, index, and symbol. An icon is similar to the thing being represented. An index is something that may not look like the object, but we as a society have decided to use it to represent the object. A symbol looks nothing like its counterpart, but we have learned to accept it.
The Wysocki reading is similar to the McCloud, although it deals with visualization differently. It discusses the many forms that letters can be a visual form of information. She also lays out forms of examining the information on the page. Such as looking at the page itself, what is on it, and what helps the reader to make connections. By looking at these, we can get more meaning. An example Wysocki uses is using large type, such as thinking of the book as a children's novel.
Love your animal character example! It clearly shows what abstract character can do.
ReplyDelete